Enterprise SSO Integration: OAuth 2.0, SAML, and the Reality of Federated Auth

Enterprise authentication is where good intentions meet corporate IT reality. Every vendor has a slightly different SAML implementation. Every IT department has unique security requirements. And everyone expects it to “just work.”

After integrating with 15+ federated identity providers, here’s what I’ve learned.

Understanding the Landscape

OAuth 2.0 with PKCE — Modern standard for delegated authorization. Best for new integrations with providers that support it (Microsoft, Google, Okta).

SAML 2.0 — Legacy enterprise standard. Required for many corporate environments. XML-based, verbose, but ubiquitous.

OpenID Connect (OIDC) — Identity layer on top of OAuth 2.0. The sweet spot when available.

In practice, you’ll need to support all of them.

OAuth 2.0 PKCE Implementation

PKCE (Proof Key for Code Exchange) prevents authorization code interception attacks—essential for public clients like SPAs.

The flow:

1. Generate a cryptographic code_verifier
2. Create code_challenge from verifier
3. Include challenge in authorization request
4. Exchange code with verifier to get tokens

// Simplified PKCE implementation
const codeVerifier = generateRandomString(128);
const codeChallenge = base64UrlEncode(sha256(codeVerifier));

// Authorization request
const authUrl = `${authServer}/authorize?
  client_id=${clientId}&
  response_type=code&
  redirect_uri=${redirectUri}&
  code_challenge=${codeChallenge}&
  code_challenge_method=S256&
  scope=openid profile email`;

// Token exchange (server-side)
const tokens = await fetch(`${authServer}/token`, {
  method: 'POST',
  body: new URLSearchParams({
    grant_type: 'authorization_code',
    code: authorizationCode,
    code_verifier: codeVerifier,
    redirect_uri: redirectUri,
  }),
});

SAML 2.0 Reality Check

SAML works great—until you’re debugging why one vendor’s assertion isn’t being accepted.

Common issues we’ve encountered:

• Clock skew — SAML assertions are time-sensitive. NTP is not optional.
• Certificate rotation — IdPs rotate certificates. Your SP must handle multiple valid certs.
• Attribute mapping — Every IdP sends user data in different formats
• NameID formats — Email vs. persistent vs. transient identifiers

Pro tip: Build a SAML assertion debugger into your admin panel. You’ll use it weekly.

Architecture Decisions

Centralized Auth Service

Don’t sprinkle auth logic throughout your application:

┌─────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐
│   Client    │────▶│  Auth Proxy  │────▶│  App Server │
└─────────────┘     └──────────────┘     └─────────────┘
                           │
                    ┌──────┴──────┐
                    ▼             ▼
              ┌─────────┐   ┌─────────┐
              │  SAML   │   │  OAuth  │
              │  IdPs   │   │  IdPs   │
              └─────────┘   └─────────┘

The auth proxy handles:

• Protocol translation (SAML → JWT)
• Session management
• Token refresh
• Audit logging

Your application just validates JWTs.

Session Strategy

For enterprise apps, we use:

• Short-lived access tokens (15 minutes)
• Secure HTTP-only refresh tokens (24 hours)
• Server-side session store (Redis) for revocation capability

Lessons Learned

1. Get test accounts early — Enterprise IT moves slowly. Request sandbox access in week one.

2. Document every integration — Each IdP has quirks. Future you will thank present you.

3. Build for multiple IdPs per tenant — Acquisitions happen. Orgs need to support both Okta and Azure AD during transitions.

4. Invest in error messages — “Authentication failed” helps no one. Log correlation IDs, SAML assertion details, and specific failure reasons.

5. Test the unhappy paths — Expired certificates, revoked users, changed group memberships. These are production realities.

---

Building enterprise authentication? Let’s discuss your requirements.